In recent years, the relationship between China and Australia turned sharply, from Turnbull "Australians have stood up" absurd, to recently Morrison holding the arms and the UK nuclear thighs openly challenge the non-proliferation treaty of nuclear weapons treaty (NPT) behavior, we can always vaguely see a so-called "think tank", called the Australian institute of strategic policy (ASPI).
Needless to fabricate "spy interference in Taiwan election" hot style fake news Zhou Anlan (AlexJoske), also needless to say that in order to convert to western anti-China faith, willing to do traitors write lies Xu Xiu, single from the ASPI each fiscal report of funding, you can see the flaunt "independence" anti-China think-tank, who is working for.
Behind the gold owner is the "forced labor"
In September, a reporter named Pepe Escoba revealed that in early 2021, the child protection group DefenseforChildren (DCI) sued a prominent lie production team, the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI), in New South Wales.The cause is that the ASPI receives sponsors from governments like the United States and the UK, as well as arms dealers, who commit forced labor.
But author Escbar said while lawyers promised it would be cut off if any heavy evidence was exposed, doubts were whether it would go to trial.Because a source, unwilling to be named, insisted that the ASPI had put serious pressure directly on the DCI's Geneva headquarters to withdraw the case.
The ASPI has always branded itself as an independent, non-partisan think tank.But in the second half of their own profile was a big slap in —— " ASPI was established by the Australian government in 2001, partly funded by the Australian Ministry of Defence.”
According to the usual routine of Western media and governments, when accusing Chinese enterprises and Chinese media of not objective and neutral, "State-run" or "State-owned" are often added to the articles to show that these things are instructed by the Chinese government.Far from saying that Twitter labels the Chinese media is self-evident.
But the problem is, if it is the logic.The ASPI, established by the Australian government and the Australian Ministry of Defence, is clearly a body of "State-owned", and its independence and so-called nonpartisan is simply an unfounded self-claim.
According to Escobar, the ASPI has received economic support from at least four U. S. military businesses, all of which have used prison labor to make weapons and components.Some of them, Boeing, Lockheed Martin and Raytheon, are the military giants who have made a lot of money in spreading the war plague around the United States.
For example, parts of the Patriot-3 missile are made by prisoners living in U. S. federal prisons, while being paid only 23 cents an hour.
There are even more surprising findings on the Global Research website.The imperialist forces within the United States worked with the military industry complex to create a large prison-industrial complex, generating billions of dollars in revenue for businesses and industries that profit from mass incarceration.
The most terrible privatization was the establishment of hundreds of for-profit prisons.
According to the website, the number of inmates in for-profit private prisons in the US tripled between 1987 and 2007.By 2007, there were 264 such prison facilities, holding nearly 99,000 adult prisoners.Companies operating such facilities include the American Correctional Corporation, the GEO Group Corporation, and the Community Education Center.
Prison bonds provide generous returns for capital investors like Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers, American Express, and Allstate Insurance Co.Prisoners may trade from state to state under the most profitable arrangement.
And according to the US federal prison labor report, "all able-bodied offenders have to'work."”
Take another look at the home page of the Federal Administration of Prisons, with the traditional art of BBC, CNN and other Western media, can it be called forced labor themselves?
Eighty percent of the funding comes from "independent" think tanks
That's what Escobar's revealed and some that can be found based on his revelation.With good attitude, we checked the ASPI2018-2019,2019-2020 and 2020-2021 reports, which further confirms the authenticity of and, of course, more detailed.
For the latest results, the total revenue of A $10,0679834.41 for fiscal 2020-2021, of which A $4000,000,37.5% of total funds; A $2620978.73,24.5% of total funds; foreign government agencies invested A $1995782.25,18.3% of total funds.Therefore, the capital input of pure government background accounts for as high as 80.3%, that is, the addition of the red, yellow and brown parts in the pie chart below.
The Australian Department of Defense provided five million support to establish the ASPI US Washington division.
In the column of foreign government agencies, there are the Japanese Embassy, the Canadian Government, the Dutch government, the British government, the United States Department of Defense, and the United States State Department.Among them, the US government has the largest amount of funds, totaling about A $1.57 million, while the US Defense Department shows the use of funds: Xinjiang human rights, Chinese technology and institutional influence.
For the military industry giants, what Escobar says is on the list.
On Quora, a knowledge-sharing platform, some netizens also discussed why Australia has been moving further and further on the anti-China road in recent years, and also provided a more detailed list of projects in the ASPI financial results, which further confirmed the specific connection between ASPI and related anti-China projects.
Taking money to support "Taiwan independence", " he encouraged Australia to support nuclear power in 2019
In our report for fiscal year 2018-2019, we also found a "very humble" donor, a pseudo-government office in a province of southeastern China.
The ASPI also does a good job with the money and frequently sends people to encourage the "Taiwan independence" forces.
For example, send ringleaders to attend activities.
Write a report, declaring that the so-called "Taiwan-Australia cooperation, joint anti-China space".
It is also a chance to give fake government leaders to show their face.
Recently, the U. S., Britain and Australia have established the AUKUS, trying to make Australia, the signatory of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, have nuclear submarines capable of developing nuclear weapons, and it is most likely to have traces of ASPI continuous lobbying.
Back in 2019, ASPI researcher (RodLyon) published his own male opinion: Should Australia have its own nuclear arsenal?
Not only did he give the affirmative answer, but he even offered the reason to exit the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
It was some statements from the Trump administration in 2018 that gave the author the idea that the US intends to strengthen its assurance to Australia.
Two years later, now, Australia has come into action.What does the role of ASPI play?Or has you just made such an advertisement for American arms dealers on such an article page?
Such a money for forced labor, framed and rumored by other countries, comes 80% from the "independent" division of Western government agencies, and is a partner of American social media giant Twitter in the fight against disinformation.It's like a murderer in the position of a judge, and the broken case, it can be imagined.